PortPro Pricing: What It Actually Costs in 2026

We directly fetched three independent software-listing pages on August 17, 2026. All three agree on the same structure:

• Capterra lists six plan tiers — Drayage Carrier (Base, Silver, Gold) and Drayage Broker (Base, Silver, Gold) — every one marked “Contact Vendor for Pricing.” Higher tiers add features like automated TIRs, per diem monitoring, and an embedded email inbox; no tier lists a number.
• GetApp (page last updated July 2026, per its own timestamp) shows “No pricing info” with a “Get Price” button in place of a rate.
• SoftwareAdvice lists the same six tiers with “Pricing available upon request” on every one, and notes that every tier includes “Unlimited Back Office Seats” — which at minimum tells us back-office headcount isn't the billing unit, whatever it turns out to be.

Search-engine result summaries for PortPro's G2 and TrustRadius listings describe a per-driver billing model, and that claim shows up elsewhere in this cluster. In the interest of full transparency here: when we tried to verify that wording ourselves by fetching g2.com/products/portpro/pricing and trustradius.com/products/portpro-drayos/pricing directly on August 17, 2026, both pages blocked automated access. We're not going to assert a per-driver structure as independently confirmed when we couldn't read the source ourselves — treat “per driver” as a plausible, commonly-repeated description rather than something we verified firsthand, and confirm the actual unit with PortPro directly (see the checklist below). For more on how carriers describe PortPro in practice, see our PortPro reviews roundup.

Every line item in the worksheet above is really a question about one bigger decision: are you swapping your system of record, or adding a layer on top of the one you already have? These carry different cost shapes, independent of what either vendor eventually quotes you.

Replacing your TMS entirely — whether that means adopting PortPro or another full platform — means a real switching cost on top of the subscription: migrating historical loads and customer records, retraining dispatchers and drivers on a new interface, running old and new systems in parallel for a stretch, and committing to a new contract term. PortPro's own comparison page puts its EDI/API setup at roughly six weeks with a dedicated data expert — that's PortPro's claim about itself, not an independently verified benchmark, but it's a reasonable proxy for the order of magnitude of effort a full switch involves.

Adding an AI operating layer on top of your current TMS — including PortPro, if that's what you already run — is a different shape of cost. There's still integration work, but no system-of-record swap, no historical-data migration, and no dispatcher retraining on a brand-new primary interface. Doublefast is built to work this way: it can sit on top of an existing TMS (including PortPro) or, for carriers without a suitable TMS today, operate as the primary workspace instead. See can AI work alongside PortPro and PortPro + drayage automation for how that pairing works in practice, and Doublefast vs PortPro for a fuller side-by-side.

Neither path is universally cheaper — a carrier that has never had a real system of record may get more value from a full TMS switch than from layering automation onto spreadsheets and texts. And a carrier that's already happy with its TMS but drowning in manual coordination work may get more value from adding a layer than from a second migration. If you're weighing PortPro against other full platforms specifically, our PortPro alternatives page and best drayage TMS platforms guide cover that comparison directly.